Empowerment of Indian women: Amendments in Hindu Succession act, 1956

Image
This Blog is written By Miss.  Vaasawa Sharma  Pursuing Ph.D. from Amity University, Gurugram. Abstract: In the ancient times, the position of women was very respectable and pious. In our epics such as Mahabharata and Ramayan, women have treated the root of Dharmas. She was always being given the position of between half of her husband. But with the advent of time, the position of women gradually declined. In the period of dharma shastras and Puranas, the girls were not given the proper opportunity to gain an education.   Many of our customs and traditions were in force which astonishingly made women suffer a lot. In the 21 st century, certain laws and regulations were made o give women, a better position and equal status with men. One such change includes the major amendment made in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in 2005 which has given rights to daughters in coparcenary property. Many other changes were also being made to improve the status of women in coparcenary property so that

RAPE: AN ALARMING CALL FOR THE NEED OF STRICT LAWS IN INDIA

This Blog is written By Miss. Tarana Noor Student of Rajasthan school of law for women, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Introduction

Rape is the 4th most common crime in India. India tops the list of the world's most dangerous countries for women. Men here have raped 4-5-8-month-old babies to 86-90 years old woman. India which was once known for its culture is drastically changing into a dangerous place for all the women out there. Every hour, every second when a woman is out there she is worried about her safety and what if the same can happen to her that has happened to other innocent lives. A woman cannot step outside her house because now she questions herself with many ifs and buts. What if she is next? Will she be alive the next moment or not? Are the men around her safe or not?  Can she be outside when it's dark? Whether what she should wear in order to be able to return home safely? Take a moment to think what if we would have taught the men of this country about how they should look up to women, maybe today what's happening would not have happened. But today, no lady can survive it in this country unless there are strict laws for the safety and security of women and strict implementation of the same. A woman is afraid to be out there and fight for herself because of the mentality that the people in our society holds. Every mother, every daughter, every woman, every girl is shattered and broken by the disgrace that men have brought to this country and to this society. So that the women of this society walk freely in this country without any restriction. In an emerging society like ours, nothing has changed for women. They are still judged by their clothes. Look at the irony now, it's men who decide what women should wear. The clothes must be worn on the basis of what suits men's eye. According to the men of this country women's clothes act as bait or an invitation or consent for men to rape. It has become more about what a woman does and neglecting the part of how a man treats a woman. It's not about what clothes a girl chooses to wear, it should be about how a man sees her, and with what mentality. It's not about the time at which women should step outside the house, it should be about how safe a man can make any place for a woman irrespective of time. It should not be about how women or girls are harassed and raped, it should be about who did it. We must replace the phrase " Who was raped" with " Who raped". A woman must be heard. She must be allowed to raise her voice. She must be given the freedom that she deserves.

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code

A man is said to commit “rape” if he—

(a) penetrates his penis, to any extent, into the vagina, mouth, urethra, or anus of a woman or makes her do so with him or any other person; or

(b) inserts, to any extent, any object or a part of the body, not being the penis, into the vagina, the urethra or anus of a woman or makes her do so with him or any other person; or

(c) manipulates any part of the body of a woman so as to cause penetration into the vagina, urethra, anus, or any part of the body of such woman or makes her do so with him or any other person; or

(d) applies his mouth to the vagina, anus, urethra of a woman or makes her do so with him or any other person,

under the circumstances falling under any of the following seven descriptions:—

1. Against her will.

2. Without her consent.

3. With her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her or any person in whom she is interested in fear of death or of hurt.

4. With her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and that her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married.

5. With her consent, when, at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent.

6. With or without her consent, when she is under sixteen years of age.

Section 376 Punishment for rape

(1) Whoever, except in the cases provided for in subsection (2), commits rape, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment of either description for a term which[1] [shall not be less than ten years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine].

Landmark cases of Rape

1. Tuka Ram And Anr vs State of Maharashtra, (Mathura Case)[2]

High Court appreciated the observation given by the learned Sessions Judge that there is a major difference between sexual intercourse and rape but they forgot to observe that there is a world of difference between “consent” and “passive submission”.

It was held that:

“Mere passive or helpless surrender of the body and its resignation to the other’s lust induced by threats or fear cannot be equated with the desire or will, nor can furnish an answer by the mere fact that the sexual act was not in opposition to such desire or volition.”

2. Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., (Bhanwari Devi Case)[3]

Supreme Court held that the sexual harassment of a woman at a workplace would be violative of her fundamental rights of gender equality and right to life and liberty under Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court concluded that such an Act would be considered as a violation of women’s human rights.

3. Mukesh & Anr. vs. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.,[4]

A Bench of Justices Dipak Mishra, R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan were unanimously passed the judgment of the Death penalty to all the accused except juvenile. The juvenile who was equally involved in the incident and raped the woman was convicted and sentenced to three years in a reformation center.

4. State of Maharashtra vs. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar,[5]

Supreme Court opined that “even a woman of easy virtue is entitled to privacy and no one can invade her privacy as and when he likes it. Therefore, merely because she is a woman of easy virtue, her evidence cannot be thrown overboard.” Also, while deciding the cases of rape, past history of victim’s sex life does not matter, she is very much entitled to the protection of the law.

5. Independent Thought vs. Union of India and Anr.,[6]

The Court opined that exception 2 in section 375 is violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Indian Constitution which allows intrusive sexual intercourse with a girl who is below 18 and above 15 years on the ground of marriage. Such an exception clause in Indian rape laws negates the very purpose of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, it violates the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). In this landmark verdict, the Supreme Court has struck down section 375, exception 2 of the Indian Penal Code.

How Punishment Must be?

·         Punishment in rape cases must not be vague but must be severe like it was in Nirbhaya's case, the rarest of rare punishment, all rape victims must be served justice. Similarly, all the accused must be punished for their criminal activities in a severe manner.

·         The more severe will be the punishment, the less will be the chances of happening crimes like rape in India.

Violation of right to life and personal liberty

·         Rape is a violation of (the) victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution that is right to life and personal liberty.

Conclusion

Rape is a serious crime. They are alarming calls for society, government, media, and judiciary. It is high time to amend the laws and improve them along with the emerging society. 

Deteriorated laws must be formulated. Rape is rape irrespective of race, religion, caste, or age. Rape must be taken into account as a serious offense and so must be the punishment.

According to NCRB data, every 16 minutes a woman is raped in India and yet hardly any strict action is taken. There is a necessity for strictness in making and implementation laws for crimes like rape in order to make India a better and safe place for women to live in or for now to survive. Every victim must have the right to seek justice. Justice must not be denied. Justice must be served and on time.


[1] Subs. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 4, for "shall not be less than seven years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine" (w.e.f. 21-4-2018).

[2] 1979 AIR 185, 1979 SCR (1) 810

[3] Air 1997 Sc 3011

[4] (2017) 3 SCC 719

[5] AIR 1991 SC 207, (1991) 1 SCC 57

[6] (2017) 10 SCC 800

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gender inequality under personal laws

Whether a screenshot is admissible as evidence?

Empowerment of Indian women: Amendments in Hindu Succession act, 1956