The type of mediator one needs as well as deserve-Attributes of a good mediator
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
This Blog is written By Mr. Hrishikesh Jaiswal Student of NLIU, Bhopal.
In the
mediation proceedings, a mediator is a neutral third party[4]
which uses effective and specialized communication and negotiation techniques[5]
and thus aids the parties in arriving at an amicable settlement.[6]
Choosing the right mediator is extremely important to the success of the
mediation, there are certain characteristics a good mediator possesses or has
trained themselves to actively engage in techniques that can assist clients in settling
the dispute. These various types of mediator styles then give parties the
chance to choose which may be more suitable towards their own particular needs
and wants.
Here we
would be listing certain traits every mediator must inculcate during the
process of mediation. These are-
1.
Confidentiality - ‘Confidentiality’ in layman
terms means the state of keeping or being kept secret or private. In mediation, it takes has a slightly different meaning, it
means that the adjudicator or mediator will not disclose anything discussed
before, during, or after the mediation process to any other person except the
people who were a part of the process and that too if necessary.[7]
He is obligated to destroy all the drafting and notes made during the session
and can disclose it to the opposite party or any third party only if it is
expressly permitted by the concerned party. It is one of the most vital
attributes which makes mediation very attractive to people. In commercial
matters, the parties generally do not wish to wash dirty linen in public and
aim to resolve the dispute without the media or their competitors getting
knowledge of it, mediation provides them with the best platform for dispute
resolution, as here, the mediator will keep all the facts and delicate
information to himself. It has been observed in many instances that famous
business houses have resolved very critical issues through Alternate Dispute
Resolution mechanisms without the public and media getting a wind of it. In
family feuds, if the matter goes to the formal court, then the situation
becomes such that both the parties throw sludge on each other to such an extent
that reconciliation becomes next to impossible, mediation provides an out and
out solution to it. Mediation has a provision for a caucus or private talks, in this,
the parties can put forward their views and the mediator presents one party’s
view to the opposite party only if necessary and that too in a dignified and
acceptable form. A mediator is required to make an unwritten pledge that he/she
would maintain the utmost confidentiality at all times.[8]
2.
Be a good listener - In court, the advocate becomes a mouthpiece of the
litigants. Mediation, unlike litigation, provides a platform for the parties to
speak up. The parties, especially in family matters, come to the mediation
sessions with a lot of emotional baggage. They look upon the mediator as a
fetish who would help them unload this baggage by listening and solving their
problems. Many people are of the opinion that good communication skills are
synonymous with good speaking skills but there is also another side to it which
is to be a good listener. In fact, since we have
two ears and only one mouth, listening just might be the more important skill.[9] The parties during
the session may disclose certain crucial information and thus it makes it very
important for the mediator to be a good auditor. Half of the battle is won if
the mediator is a good listener.[10]
3.
Legal Knowledge – In India, Mediation has a history as old as the Rig Veda and earlier it
existed in the form of the Panchayat system.[11]
This particular trait of command of legal
knowledge is not necessary for community-mediation but for court assisted
and institutional mediation this becomes mandatory. It is a well-established
fact that a mediator is having the freedom to choose the procedure that is to
be involved during the proceedings, but it should be kept in mind that the
procedure adopted should be based on the principles of natural justice and not
against the public policy. It is preferable that the mediator is having a law-related
background, for example, he/she should be a lawyer or an ex-judge. The mediator is
expected to have the basic knowledge about subjects of law such as Contract
Law, Personal Laws, and Property Laws, etc. The settlements made among the
parties should be such that they would not fall apart once they are tested on
the touchstone of law.[12]In
India, Mediation Rules, 2003 [13]have
laid down a set of compulsory rules that are to be followed by the court-appointed
mediators present across the nation.
4.
Promptness and timeliness – Everyone is aware of the ‘tareek pe tareek’ culture in India, the
main reason for the formulation of alternate modes of dispute settlement was
that the Courts in India are becoming sluggish and slack with every passing
day. Cases go on for years and years, in many cases, it was found that the
litigant had passed away before the final judgment of the case. The mediation
process, unlike the conventional courts, generally have a pre-planned schedule.[14]
The mediator in consultation with the parties prepares and schedule slots for
the parties as per their time and convenience. A good mediator should try and
make sure that time is not wasted in unnecessary and malicious delays, but he
should also know when it is imperative to take adjournments. Sometimes it
becomes essential to give adjournments, so as to give the parties a proper
chance to make strategies, consult the elders, and to bring down their emotional
quotient.[15]A mediator is expected to know what is foremost for their clients and should
always act in the best interest of the parties. At times, the parties may opt
for mediation just to delay the matter and waste the time, a mediator should be
able to speculate and judge these ballgames and accordingly respond to it.
5.
Professionalism – According to the Cambridge Dictionary[16],
‘professionalism’ means the combination of all the qualities that are connected with trained and skilled people. In a similar vein, the mediators are
required and expected to act like professionals. This starts with dolling up in
professional attire. The clients should be in the impression that they are sitting
in an actual court where the only thing going on is business.[17]
There is a hair-line difference between the expected professionalism in a court
and a mediation session and the person who gets this matures into an excellent
mediator. Alternatively, overdressing might turn into a disaster, as on many
occasions, the parties might not be from a very opulent background, and thus
overdressing might ruin the confidence of the parties.[18]
Also, professionalism should not be confused to using technical and legal
jargons, the mediator should use the terminology and vocabulary which the
parties can apprehend and comprehend, for
example, if the parties in the case are not comfortable in communication in
English language and even after this the mediator is still using it thinking
that it might look unprofessional will be a massive faux pas. Another important
aspect of professionalism is giving credit. A mediator should always make sure
that due credit is given to all the people who have assisted the parties during
the mediation session.[19]
In conclusion, we can say that at the end of the day, even mediators are
human beings, and thus possessing all these traits are not practically possible
but still, every person in this business should try to infuse these
characteristics to be able to give their best. Different
contexts require the conscious use of different personal qualities for the best
services available in the interest of the users.[20]
Also, every dispute is idiosyncratic and
we cannot evolve a straight-jacket formula of how to react in a particular situation, but the best thing to do is to provide the mediators with proper
instruction and training. Mediation has a lot of scope in India and we have a gold mine of the best mediators in the world and in the future, we can be a
Mediation Hub for the world.
[1]STA Law Firm,
Comparative Analysis Of ADR Methods With
Focus On Their Advantages And Disadvantages, Mondaq, February 05, 2019, https://www.mondaq.com/arbitration-dispute-resolution/777618/comparative-analysis-of-adr-methods-with-focus-on-their-advantages-and-disadvantages
[2] Cheryl A. Picard, The Many
Meanings of Mediation: A Sociological Study of Mediation in Canada‘
(Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 2000).
[3] Serdar Jola Piletića, Podgorica, Basic Principles of Mediation, August 29, 2017, http://www.posredovanje.me/en/posredovanje/osnovna-nacela-posredovanja
[4] Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E.A. Sander, Nancy H. Rogers & S.R.
Cole, Dispute Resolution:
Negotiation, Mediation, and Other Processes (Aspen Law & Business, New York, 3rd Edn.).
[5] Joanne Goss, “An Introduction to Alternative Dispute Resolution”, 34
(1) Alta. L. Rev. 1 (1995) (Can.).
[6] Henry J. Brown and Arthur L. Mariot, ADR Principles and Practice (Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2nd
Edn.,1997).
[7] Kimberly Taylor, Esq., Mediation:
Confidentiality and Enforceability, JAMS ADR Blog, April 6, 2015, https://www.jamsadr.com/blog/2015/mediation-confidentiality-and-enforceability#:~:text=Mediation%3A%20Confidentiality%20and%20Enforceability%20of%20the%20Process,April%206%2C%202015&text=An%20essential%20element%20of%20a%20successful%20mediation%20is%20confidentiality.&text=A%20mediator%20should%20not%20disclose,rule%20or%20other%20legal%20authority.%E2%80%9D
[8] Shraddha Bhosale, Confidentiality in
Mediation: An Indian Perspective,
Kluwer Mediation
Blog, January 18, 2016, http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/01/18/confidentiality-in-mediation-an-indian-perspective/?doing_wp_cron=1597226022.6561560630798339843750
[9] Nancy Foster,
Good
Communication Starts With Listening, MediateIndia.com, mediate.com/articles/foster2.cfm
[10] Robert Bolton, People Skills (New
York: Simon & Schuster, 1979)
[11] Dr. Pankaj Kakde, Mediation via
Panchayat System in India: Ancient to ModernIndian Jurisprudence,
Law Beacon, Peer-reviewed, Bi-annual Journal Published
by Akola Law College, Vol.1 p.n. 92-96
[12] LaxmiKant Gaur, QUALITIES OF A
GOOD MEDIATOR, Delhi district courts e-
Journal, https://delhidistrictcourts.nic.in/ejournals/Q_mediation2.pdf
[13] ADR and Mediation Rules, 2003, https://www.latestlaws.com/bare-acts/central-acts-rules/alternative-dispute-resolution-laws/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996/adr-mediation-rules2003/
[14] Pon Staff, The Mediation Process
and Dispute Resolution: Understand the 6 steps necessary in the mediation
process, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL DAILY BLOG, July 7, 2020, https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/mediation/dispute-resolution-how-mediation-unfolds/
[15] Supra at 12
[16] Professionalism, Cambridge
Dictionary, (10th ed. 2014)
[17] Josefina
Rendon, Mediator
Ethics and Professionalism: A Recipe for Success, MediateIndia, https://www.mediate.com/articles/RendonJ6.cfm
[18] Ibid
[19] David Jones, The Advantages and
Disadvantages of Mediation, Glaisyers,
November 8, 2019, https://www.glaisyers.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-mediation/
Comments
Great article...
ReplyDelete